الحق في الحياة

Primary tabs

Caselaw

A group of citizens living with HIV/AIDS filed an amparo action against the Health and Assistance Ministry (HAM) due to its refusal to deliver drugs needed to treat the virus as prescribed (triple therapy). Applicants had no social security and lacked financial means to buy the prescribed drugs.

The Yakye Axa community, a Paraguayan indigenous community belonging to the Lengua Enxet Sur people, filed a complaint with the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (IACHR) alleging Paraguay had failed to acknowledge its right to property over ancestral land. Given its impossibility to solve the case, the Commission referred it to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

Gran cantidad de residentes de basties (asentamientos informales) de la ciudad de Dhaka fueron desalojados sin aviso previo y sus viviendas fueron demolidas con topadoras. Dos residentes y tres ciudadanos presentaron un reclamo cuestionando las demoliciones en nombre del interés público. La Corte Suprema sostuvo que los habitantes tenían ciertos derechos a una vivienda y a una audiencia justa, y emitió recomendaciones para su reasentamiento.

Varias organizaciones no gubernamentales presentaron una acción de protección por el deficiente tratamiento terapéutico y quirúrgico de los niños/as con cardiopatías congénitas, pacientes del Hospital de Niños J. M. de los Ríos de Caracas. Fundaron la acción en los derechos a la vida y a la salud previstos en la Constitución, en tratados de derechos humanos y en la Ley Orgánica para la Protección del Niño y del Adolescente. Los niños eran sometidos a largas esperas para acceder al cupo quirúrgico.

El Ministerio de Salud del Estado de Chile dictó un decreto que obligaba a suministrar tratamiento médico y diagnóstico gratuito de todas las enfermedades de transmisión sexual, incluido el Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida (SIDA). Sin embargo, dicha normativa no se cumplía en los casos de VIH.

Un grupo de personas afiliadas al Instituto Venezolano de los Seguros Sociales (IVSS) que viven con HIV interpusieron una acción de amparo contra dicha institución para que se les garantizara tanto la entrega regular y periódica de los medicamentos de la triterapia como los medicamentos para el tratamiento de las enfermedades oportunistas y la realización y cobertura de los gastos de los exámenes médicos necesarios. Solicitaron, además, que los efectos de la sentencia se extendieran a todos las personas con HIV afiliados al IVSS.

Jeannine Godin lived in poverty and relied on social assistance.  The Minister of Health and Social Services had been granted custody of her three children for six months, and was applying to extend this for another six months.  She applied to legal aid for a lawyer to represent her at the hearing but was denied because legal aid did not cover temporary custody hearings.  She applied to the court for an order that funds be provided for a lawyer and asked for a declaration that the restricted eligibility for legal aid violated her rights to life, liberty and security of the person under s.

The case involved a challenge by certain private professional educational facilities to the constitutionality of state laws regulating capitation fees charged by such institutions.  

Under Sections 20 and 21 of the Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976, the State Government exempted certain excess land from the provisions of the Act on the condition that the land be used by the builders for the purpose of providing housing for the ‘weaker sections of society.'  It was alleged that the builders had not done so. Although it found that the applicant's writ of petition had been rendered infructuous, the Bombay High Court gave some directions regarding future monitoring of the scheme sanctioned under Section 20.
 

South Africa is in the midst of an HIV/AIDS epidemic with more than 6 million people infected.    In 2,000, with infections of newborns in the range of 80,000 per year, the anti-retroviral drug Nevirapine offered the potential of preventing the infection of 30 – 40,000 children per year.  The drug was offered to the Government for free for five years, but the South African Government announced it would introduce Mother-To-Child-Transmission (MTCT) only in certain pilot sites and would delay setting these up for a year, thereby denying most mothers access to treatment.  The Treatment Action