Droit des enfants

Onglets principaux

Caselaw

Esta sentencia del año 2014 fue dictada después de tres rondas de litigación.

Este caso se refiere a una apelación de 2009 ante el Tribunal Constitucional de Sudáfrica, presentado por el Jefe del Departamento de Educación de Mpumalanga (HoD).

This case concerns a 2009 appeal before the Constitutional Court of South Africa, brought by the Head of the Mpumalanga Department of Education (HoD).

In 2003, four year old Jeremiah Cronin, diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity and autism, was assessed as needing a 32-hour-per-week intensive home-based program to meet his special needs while awaiting placement in Cork CABAS School.  His mother instituted an action for injunctive relief directing the Minister for Education (“the Minister”) to provide such home-based tuition for 29 hours per week during the child’s pre-school phase.  She claimed that her son was entitled to a free primary education under the Irish Constitution, relying on the Irish Supreme Court’s reference to uph

La demanda fue iniciada por Paul O’Donoghue, quien  nació en noviembre de 1984, y contrajo el síndrome de Reyes, una  infección viral  grave: como resultado de la misma, a los 8 meses de edad sufrió  daños cerebrales.

Applicant Paul O’Donoghue was born in November 1984 and contracted Reyes Syndrome, a serious viral infection, at eight months old, suffering brain damage as a result.

El Alto Tribunal Social de Renania del Norte-Westfalia le solicitó a la Corte Constitucional de Alemania que decida si los subsidios económicos entregados  a los solicitantes de asilo conforme la sección 3, párrafo 2, de la Ley de Beneficios para Solicitantes de Asilo cumplían con el derecho constitucional a condiciones mínimas para una existencia digna.

The Higher Social Court of North Rhine-Westphalia asked the German Federal Constitutional Court to decide whether the cash benefits for asylum seekers provided under section 3 paragraph 2 of the Asylum Seekers Benefit Act comply with the constitutional right to a minimum standard of living.

The plaintiff filed an injunction aimed at guaranteeing the right of a 12 year-old girl to her mental health, among other rights. The girl became pregnant in early 2011 and started presenting symptoms of anxiety and depression, as diagnosed by different physicians, who recommended the interruption of her pregnancy.