Share
Wednesday, September 6, 2006
Share

Nature of the Case

Communication seeking to assert right to equality before the law in the enjoyment of the right to housing of Roma (Article 5(e)(iii), International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination);  Retrogressive measure.

Enforcement of the Decision and Outcomes

The council cancelled both resolutions and adopted a one-line Resolution, simply stating that it “takes into account the Opinion of the Committee […] and cancels [the above] resolutions”.  This new Resolution fails to take into account the recommendation of the Slovakian Government issued in line with the Opinion of the Committee to place them in the same position as they were prior to the second resolution.  The Municipality so far has no plan to build low cost housing and claims that they not are not obliged to approve or design a plan for such housing. The criminal prosecution initiated against the five member ‘petition committee’ [who produced a petition signed by inhabitants of Dobšiná which convinced the council to cancel the initial resolution] has not yet resulted in a formal indictment being filed.

Significance of the Case

This case highlights the major role that local authorities have to play in remedying the situation of vulnerable groups such as Roma.  It demonstrates that action on the part of central government may be insufficient to ensure state compliance with the Committee’s findings where the municipal authority refused to take the necessary steps.

Groups Involved in the Case

Andi Dubroshi, European Roma Rights Center H-1386 Budapest 62 PO Box 906/93 Hungary www.errc.org email: andi@errc.org/office@errc.org Columbus Igboanus League of Human Rights Advocates Zabotova 2, 811 04 Bratislava Slovakia Tel/fax: 421 2-524 94 720 Email: columbusike@yahoo.com website: http://www.lhra-icpr.org email: admin@lhra-icpr.org