Enforcement of the Decision and Outcomes
Although it had been requested that the decision be made extensive to all those affected and not just the applicants, the Court did not uphold this request. Consequently, the action was repeatedly filed on many occasions until the social security system changed the policy. In 2001, in another case filed by PROVEA and ACCSI against Instituto Venezolano de los Seguros Sociales (IVSS, Venezuela’s Social Security Authority), the Supreme Court’s Constitutional Division acknowledged common interests by accepting a group of HIV-positive persons -who had filed an amparo seeking drugs- as representatives of all people suffering the virus (see in this database López Glenda y otros c. Instituto Venezolano de los Seguros Sociales (IVSS) s/ acción de amparo).