Significance of the Case
The case is significant as, in it, the Commission fleshed out the negative and positive obligations imposed on states by Article 16, 24 and 21 as well as the implied rights to food and housing/shelter. Another interesting aspect is the fact that the Commission stated that governments have a duty to protect their citizens by protecting them from damaging acts that may be perpetrated by private parties and that this duty calls for positive action on part of governments. An additional positive aspect of the decision was the Commission’s recognition that the rights expressly set out in the Charter are not exhaustive of the rights protected by it. This case lay the groundwork for subsequent, innovative human rights argumentation by advancing the recognition that oil extraction and processing resulted in effects on a range of human rights (life, housing, health, food, water, etc.), which interacted with each other to produce far-reaching damages to the lands and livelihoods of the Ogoni people.
Overall, though, the principal impact from the African Commission ruling involves the recognition of the Ogoni people. While they constitute a minority ethnic group in a country where the political system largely reflects ethnic affiliations, the Ogoni have increasingly been recognized by the Federal Government as a force to be reckoned with, as recently as March of 2014, when the former leader of MOSOP was invited to attend an exclusive National Conference. It has also reinforced increasingly successful efforts by Ogoni leaders to organize community members to demand justice for the crimes they have experienced. On January 4, 2014, “Ogoni Day” was celebrated in the Niger Delta by over 50,000 people who came together in a peaceful demonstration to demand full respect for their human rights.