Significance of the Case
The decision is groundbreaking in international human rights law terms due to its in-depth engagement with the relationship between human rights and access to energy. While there have been calls by various international committees and United Nations bodies to uplift the need for adequate energy as a right, the explicit connections that the European Committee of Social Rights was able to draw between energy and its crucial role in realizing collection of other social rights, not simply adequate housing, is powerful. There is only one previous decision by the Committee that condemned a State for a greater number of violations of the European Social Charter than those committed by Spain in this case.
This is also the first time a human rights body has declared that the people in Cañada Real have had their rights infringed in the four years since the power outages began. There has finally been acknowledgment by a governing body that there are means to remedy the situation in a practical manner with actionable steps, and that the government has the obligation to supply electricity, rather than allowing the responsibility to fall on private companies.
The reasoning used in this decision can help future groups and communities hold other States accountable to revitalize energy poor areas. The conceptual importance of adequate energy and State responsibility, alongside the means with which to realize those findings, will strengthen a foundation in international law supporting calls upon States to create and prioritize systems of sustainable energy for their communities.