Summary
This case involves the denial of requests for residency permits from the Ministry of Home Affairs and Immigration, filed by foreign nationals in same-sex marriages with Namibian residents. Foreign nationals of South Africa and Germany sought to settle in Namibia with their partners after getting married in their home countries where same-sex marriage is recognized. Under section (2)(1)(c) of the Immigration Control Act of 1993, the foreign spouse of a Namibian resident is entitled to live and work in Namibia without obtaining permits for permanent residency and employment. However, the Ministry of Home Affairs and Immigration interpreted the term spouse in the Immigration Control Act to exclude a spouse in a same-sex marriage and denied their requests.
The affected individuals brought a claim against the Ministry of Home Affairs in the High Court to challenge the denial of the residency permits. The High Court found that the Ministry had violated the constitution but dismissed the case due to an earlier decision in the case Immigration Board v. Frank.
The claimants appealed to the Supreme Court for a renewed assessment of the constitutional rights of same-sex couples under the Immigration Control Act. They sought a declaratory relief to order the Ministry of Home Affairs to recognize their respective marriages under section (2)(1)(c) of the Immigration Control Act. Further, the claimants sought an order to declare section (2)(1)(c) unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court found that a marriage properly concluded in a foreign jurisdiction must be recognized according to a well-established principle of common law. The Court reasoned the Ministry had discriminated against same-sex couples by deviating from this general principle without raising any public policy reasons for the distinction.
The Supreme Court also found that the claimants constitutional rights to dignity and equality had been violated by the denial of the residency permits. Under the Namibian Constitution, Article 8 recognizes a right to dignity and a closely related right to equality is recognized in Article 10. According to the court, the Ministry’s differentiation between heterosexual couples and same-sex couples created a “profound impairment of their fundamental human dignity.” To comply with the constitution, the term spouse in the Immigration Control Act must be interpreted to include same-sex spouses lawfully married in another country. Thus, the Supreme Court ordered the Ministry to recognize the claimant’s marriages for the purposes of the Immigration Control Act.