Significance of the Case
This judgment represents a significant victory for victims of wartime sexual slavery, and confirms the legal responsibility of the state of Japan in regards to binding norms of international law. This case is the second such decision, the first being from the Seoul Central District Court in January 2021, where they recognized the tort liability of Japan in a lawsuit filed by another group of victim-survivors of the comfort women system.
The court’s unique analysis of both public international law and domestic law presents a roadmap for advocates working in similar spaces throughout the world, whether for victims of wartime sexual violence or other crimes against humanity. In particular, the court’s holding that sovereign immunity did not apply in this case could be utilized by other groups of victims seeking reparations and apologies from state actors.
For their contributions, special thanks to ESCR-Net member: the Program on Human Rights and the Global Economy (PHRGE) at Northeastern University.