Enforcement of the Decision and Outcomes
During the execution stage of the ruling, following the decision of the Court of Appeals to uphold the decision of the court of first instance, discussions arose as to how the diploma should be drafted, since the Ministry of Education of the City of Buenos Aires had drafted a diploma with specific wording reflecting the provisions under which it was issued (made after he had graduated), wording which was not contained in the diplomas awarded to his classmates. As a result, it was requested that a new diploma be issued without such references. On December 4, 2017, the Court of First Instance ruled that “it is clear that the petitioner’s diploma has not been issued in the same conditions as that of his fellow 2013 graduates,” noting that any mention that has the sole purpose of arbitrarily differentiating certain persons or circumstances constituted discrimination in the issuance of the diploma. Consequently, it ruled that the City Government issue a new diploma, in compliance with the request of the petitioning party.
In December 2017, R., C. A. received his high school diploma.