Share
Thursday, February 20, 2025

We united a coalition of international organizations, human rights defenders and advocates, urgently call on Colombian environmental authorities to intervene in the recent decisions of the Agencia Nacional de Minería (ANM) to grant mining titles in multiple municipalities across Tolima. These decisions threaten the fundamental rights of Indigenous and campesino communities, whose livelihoods and cultural identities are deeply tied to the ecological integrity of their territories.

Share
1
Aerial view of CEMEX operations in Payandé (Tolima, Colombia).

February, 2025

To the Environmental Authorities of Colombia.

Subject: Urgent Call for Support and Intervention Regarding Mining Title Decisions in Tolima, Colombia

We the undersigned write to express our grave concerns regarding the decisions of the Agencia Nacional de Minería (ANM) to grant mining titles in Coyaima, Chaparral, San Luis (Payandé), Valle del San Juan, Saldaña, Natagaima,  Falan, Cajamarca and other municipalities in the Tolima department of Colombia.

These decisions have profound implications for the fundamental rights of Indigenous and campesino communities, whose economic sustenance and cultural identity are intrinsically linked to the ecological balance and sustainability of these territories. The ANM’s actions appear to prioritize technical, legal, economic, and environmental considerations without adequately accounting for critical issues such as:

  • The agricultural vocation and ecological integrity of these territories;
  • The self-determination and the importance of spirituality for indigenous peoples on the care of water systems, soils and mountains, air and energy, in the reproduction of their culture; and
  • The broader social, cultural, and environmental impacts on the communities involved.

Furthermore, we are deeply concerned about the misuse of Public Mining Hearings as superficial mechanisms for participation. These hearings do not comply with the standards of free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) established by Colombia’s Law 21 of 1991 and International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention 169. This non-compliance undermines the rights of Indigenous peoples to meaningful participation in decisions that affect their territories.

We find it critical that the government advances in the implementation of the Escazú Agreement to address the high levels of socio-environmental conflict caused by excessive mining concessions. 

According to data from the NGO Global Witness, Colombia has the highest rates of killings of land and environmental defenders in the world. It is urgent to implement measures that guarantee the rights of access to information, participation, and environmental justice, ensuring the protection and fulfillment of the rights of affected communities.

We encourage the Colombian government to fulfill its commitment expressed at the recent COP16 on Biodiversity by promoting Peace with Nature and addressing the just demands of socio-environmental movements in the department of Tolima and throughout Colombia.

These hearings do not comply with the consultation standards required under Colombia’s Law 21 of 1991 and ILO Convention 169, nor do they meet the standard of free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) as affirmed in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Specifically, Article 1 of the ICESCR emphasizes the right of peoples to self-determination and to freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development. Furthermore, Article 12 of the ICESCR guarantees the right to a healthy environment as an integral part of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

We join Comité Ambiental en Defensa de la Vida y el Agua and the affected communities in urging the ANM and relevant authorities to:

  1. Immediately suspend the viability of mining projects until comprehensive and genuine FPIC processes are conducted;
  2. Integrate cultural, spiritual, and socioeconomic criteria in the evaluation of all mining projects;
  3. Ensure participatory processes are free from manipulation and uphold the principles of transparency and equity.

We respectfully request your support in amplifying this issue and joining efforts to demand a more holistic and rights-based approach to natural goods management. By ensuring that the decisions affecting these communities are guided by their rights and needs, we can collectively uphold the principles of justice, equity, and sustainability.

Thank you for your attention and commitment to this cause. We remain available for further dialogue and collaboration to address this urgent matter.

Sincerely,

Signed:

  1. A 11 – Initiative for Economic and Social Rights, Serbia
  2. Accountability Counsel, USA 
  3. Alliance for Rural Democracy (ARD), Liberia
  4. ALTSEAN-Burma, Thailand
  5. Anti-Jindal & Anti-POSCO Movement (JPPSS), India 
  6. Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact, Thailand
  7. Asociación de Pequeños y medianos ganaderos de Chaparral, Colombia
  8. Buffalo Human Rights Center, University at Buffalo School of Law, USA
  9. Centre for Human Rights and Development, Mongolia
  10. Colectiva ExpresArte, Colombia
  11. Comité Ambiental en Defensa de la Vida, Colombia 
  12. Comité de Solidaridad con los Presos Políticos, Colombia 
  13. CONASUD, Argentina
  14. Confederación Campesina del Perú, Perú 
  15. Consejo de Pueblos Wuxhtaj (Hermanos), Guatemala 
  16. Due Process of Law Foundation, Regional
  17. Elseidi Law Firm, Egypt
  18. Endorois Welfare Council, Kenya 
  19. Federación Colombiana de Educadores (FECODE), Colombia
  20. Fuerza Común Tolima , Colombia
  21. Fundación Barranquilla+20, Colombia
  22. Fundación Promoción Humana, Argentina
  23. Human Rights Awareness Center, Nepal
  24. International Accountability Project, Global
  25. International Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific (IWRAW AP), Malaysia
  26. Katribu Kalipunan ng Katutubong Mamamayan ng Pilipinas, Philippines
  27. Kisora, Kenya
  28. Lok Shakti Abhiyan, India
  29. Manushya Foundation, Thailand
  30. MUFRAS-32, El Salvador 
  31. NAFSO, Sri Lanka
  32. Natural Resource Women Platform, Liberia
  33. Observatori DESCA, Spain
  34. OFRANEH, Honduras
  35. Ogoni youth alliance for climate change and sustainable development, Nigeria 
  36. Pax Christi Internacional, Bélgica
  37. Pueblo Originario Kichwa de Sarayaku, Ecuador 
  38. Snapap/cgata , Algérie
  39. Uganda Association of Women Lawyers( FIDA- Uganda), Uganda
  40. UNIÓN DE TRABAJADORAS AFROCOLOMBIANAS DEL SERVICIO DOMÉSTICO, Colombia
  41. Zimbabwe People’s Land Rights Movement, Zimbabwe
  42. Amnesty International, Global